Love that your new slant is to try and reform an organization that you would have control over instead of proving your abilities on the field like you've been declaring for years. USAU is doing great, UFA is doing great, PUL/WUL doing great. Majority of people are enjoying the sport across the country and world; you are just being left behind with no legacy except failures and blaming others for your short falls.
I will think of you in church this weekend as you continue to crash out. Diva down. :(
USAU is not doing great. I saw Rhino Slam in person and on the live stream last fall. Any of the top 4 teams in any of the National Championships from 1989-2019 would completely destroy them. They’re not very good. The only reason they won was because the other 7 teams that made it to Quarters all had older (soon to retire) players that didn’t have the stamina to make it through semis and finals.
I’ve got an idea, instead of insulting me, why not actually debate the arguments that I made. Ultimate is both based on Marxist New Games (fact) and Ultimate is a mashup of dead-ball game mechanics in an obviously continuous play framework (fact). You can’t dispute either of these facts so maybe the best you can do is to try to argue how both of these things are good things. Anyone how tries to defend either of these (not to mention both) is being foolish. They’re both indefensible.
Love that your new slant is to try and reform an organization that you would have control over instead of proving your abilities on the field like you've been declaring for years. USAU is doing great, UFA is doing great, PUL/WUL doing great. Majority of people are enjoying the sport across the country and world; you are just being left behind with no legacy except failures and blaming others for your short falls.
I will think of you in church this weekend as you continue to crash out. Diva down. :(
USAU is not doing great. I saw Rhino Slam in person and on the live stream last fall. Any of the top 4 teams in any of the National Championships from 1989-2019 would completely destroy them. They’re not very good. The only reason they won was because the other 7 teams that made it to Quarters all had older (soon to retire) players that didn’t have the stamina to make it through semis and finals.
I’ve got an idea, instead of insulting me, why not actually debate the arguments that I made. Ultimate is both based on Marxist New Games (fact) and Ultimate is a mashup of dead-ball game mechanics in an obviously continuous play framework (fact). You can’t dispute either of these facts so maybe the best you can do is to try to argue how both of these things are good things. Anyone how tries to defend either of these (not to mention both) is being foolish. They’re both indefensible.